Shenandoah Circuit Poll - Page 8 - Dorkiphus.net
Navigation » Dorkiphus.net > Technical & Track Disussions > Track Talk » Shenandoah Circuit Poll

Track Talk A place to talk about Track and DE Events, share driving tips and other Track related items.

View Poll Results: How do you feel about the Shenandoah Circuit at Summit Point?
Love it! Wish there were more events there. 28 38.36%
It's OK; no better, no worse than other tracks out there. 17 23.29%
Don't like it, but I'll still sign up for events there. 14 19.18%
Hate it! I won't go to events there. 14 19.18%
Voters: 73. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #71  
Old 03-20-2007, 04:56 PM
VaSteve's Avatar
VaSteve VaSteve is offline
Essential Personnel
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Western Prince William County
Posts: 13,891
VaSteve has one HoF thread
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TD in DC View Post

The "limit" may well be higher for a mid-engined car (I am sure it is), but physics dictates that it will spin more rapidly when it finally does break loose than will a rear-engined car.
Huh, Spin more rapidly (break free easier) or spin faster (more 360s)??
__________________
1983 911 SC Targa - 1990 944 S2
Reply With Quote
  #72  
Old 03-20-2007, 05:12 PM
Toby's Avatar
Toby Toby is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 878
Toby
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AJ986S View Post
I believe the 944 and Box's are great in their own rite, but IMHO they are easier cars to learn to drive fast. More neutral & forgiving... they won't bite you quite like a 911 when you do goof.
Quote:
Originally Posted by }{arlequin View Post
edit: you may have to react quicker to catch the boxter rotation but that's just reflexes... still say it's easier to move hands quickly w/ a twitch to catch a twich than make a aircraft-carrier-u-turn type of a catch w/ a 911
Quote:
Originally Posted by TD in DC View Post
nice edit.

You have never driven a mid-engined car at the limit, have you? I am telling you that once you get to that point, it is very hard to catch. A rear-engined car is fairly predictable. It may come out sooner, but an experienced driver will know when to expect it to come around, and you can take steps to deal with it. If you can't catch a 911 when it starts to swing around, I can almost guarantee you that you will not be able to catch a mid-engined car when it swings around.
I tend to agree with Tony and }{. Boxsters are relatively easy to catch at the limit, since they react to counter-steering extremely well. There is certainly some anticipation and reflex involved, but they are at least "save-able".

In the many autocrosses I have participated, I rarely ever see a Boxster spinning.

This is not to say they are not driven hard! I spin my Miata at AX regularly, but have yet to do it with the Boxster.
__________________
Toby
2005 997
www.teamshum.com

Previous:
2009 Boxster S
1991 964 C2
2001 Boxster S
Reply With Quote
  #73  
Old 03-20-2007, 05:23 PM
racer's Avatar
racer racer is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: South Riding, Va
Posts: 7,237
racer
Default

My mid-engine experience so far has been 914's. Hopefully soon I will add my boxster to the list. My rear engine experiences are 911SC and 911S based.. old school.

I perceived the 911 actually easier to drive at/approaching the limit because of the rear bias. Connected to the car, the 911 is very communicative of what it is doing. Only those not paying attention get caught out, imho.

The 914 was very forgiving as you approached the limit. Quick countersteers were all that were needed to keep it going straight whereas the 911 required greater efforts/measures to stay straight.

On the other hand, once spinning, the 914 would spin for much longer than the 911. The 911 "hammer" would spin out in a nice big arc. The 914 would sit and spin on itself.

It is small degrees of separation of this communication that the car gives the driver. Both can be overdriven and spun out. The 911 is easier to spin by ignoring its warnings. The 914 hid its warnings better and therefore felt like when it let go, it went "without warning", if you will.

Both are great fun and both need to be learned.

Suprisingly, I think TD is more right than wrong on this one TD, when are you getting a 914?
__________________
Dave
- 1970 914-6
Past
- 2000 Boxster
- 1987 944
- 1987 924S
- 1978 911 Euro SC
- 1976 914 2.0
- 1970 914 1.7 / 2056cc
Reply With Quote
  #74  
Old 03-20-2007, 05:49 PM
Toby's Avatar
Toby Toby is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 878
Toby
Default

Wait... I thought owners of yellow Boxsters won't disagree with each other
__________________
Toby
2005 997
www.teamshum.com

Previous:
2009 Boxster S
1991 964 C2
2001 Boxster S
Reply With Quote
  #75  
Old 03-20-2007, 05:57 PM
Rob in VA's Avatar
Rob in VA Rob in VA is offline
Professional coach
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 3,761
Rob in VA
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toby View Post
Wait... I thought owners of yellow Boxsters won't disagree with each other
I think we'd be in agreement, if you drove your boxster harder at your next autox event. I was always spinning that sucka during autox, made some saves, and lost a lot too...
__________________
We will now use the power of the Continuum Transfunctioner to banish you to Hoboken, New Jersey.

BMW Spec E46 #609

BMW specE30 #609

2004 911 GT3 - Seal Grey
Reply With Quote
  #76  
Old 03-20-2007, 06:31 PM
TD in DC's Avatar
TD in DC TD in DC is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: In DC of course . . .
Posts: 9,949
TD in DC
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by racer View Post
My mid-engine experience so far has been 914's. Hopefully soon I will add my boxster to the list. My rear engine experiences are 911SC and 911S based.. old school.

I perceived the 911 actually easier to drive at/approaching the limit because of the rear bias. Connected to the car, the 911 is very communicative of what it is doing. Only those not paying attention get caught out, imho.

The 914 was very forgiving as you approached the limit. Quick countersteers were all that were needed to keep it going straight whereas the 911 required greater efforts/measures to stay straight.

On the other hand, once spinning, the 914 would spin for much longer than the 911. The 911 "hammer" would spin out in a nice big arc. The 914 would sit and spin on itself.

It is small degrees of separation of this communication that the car gives the driver. Both can be overdriven and spun out. The 911 is easier to spin by ignoring its warnings. The 914 hid its warnings better and therefore felt like when it let go, it went "without warning", if you will.

Both are great fun and both need to be learned.

Suprisingly, I think TD is more right than wrong on this one TD, when are you getting a 914?
This is all I was trying to say. I wasn't trying to say that it was impossible to catch, but only that they spin faster when they do spin.
__________________
Thank Me Dammit!
Reply With Quote
  #77  
Old 03-20-2007, 06:34 PM
TD in DC's Avatar
TD in DC TD in DC is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: In DC of course . . .
Posts: 9,949
TD in DC
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toby View Post
I tend to agree with Tony and }{. Boxsters are relatively easy to catch at the limit, since they react to counter-steering extremely well. There is certainly some anticipation and reflex involved, but they are at least "save-able".
nowhere and at no time have I ever said that it is not save-able. What I said was that, although the limit is higher, when you do hit that limit and the car spins, it is more likely to spin faster than a rear-engined car would spin (i.e., the rate of yaw would increase at a more rapid rate).

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toby View Post
In the many autocrosses I have participated, I rarely ever see a Boxster spinning.

This is not to say they are not driven hard! I spin my Miata at AX regularly, but have yet to do it with the Boxster.
This is not inconsistent with anything I have said. I have said from the beginning that the limit is higher. That's why it is a venerable racing platform.
__________________
Thank Me Dammit!
Reply With Quote
  #78  
Old 03-20-2007, 10:09 PM
howiemy's Avatar
howiemy howiemy is offline
Freeloader
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Oakton, VA
Posts: 204
howiemy
Smile SP Shenandoah

First time Green 944 pilot...I liked the feedback of consistent improvement, although some rough edges, a dose of reality is important for me right now, IMO.
I am a minimal investment 944 jockey, so I'm good with the setup, and the proximity to NOVA./DC is great!

In the future, if I get more investment motivated in the car department, it might get frustrating...i.e. my left arm hurts from pass signing the air cooled brothern.

I am going back at least 4 X this year for seat time.

HM
__________________
1985.5 944 NA - DE P-car for sale
2001 Mustang GT Convertible
2001 Expedition EB 4x4
Reply With Quote
  #79  
Old 03-21-2007, 12:52 AM
CrewChief's Avatar
CrewChief CrewChief is offline
Freeloader
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Leesburg, VA
Posts: 271
CrewChief
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by VaSteve View Post
You get to 5th gear in a 997 on the back straight? Wow.
Keep in mind; the backstraight starts 2 corners before you actually get there.
Reply With Quote
  #80  
Old 03-21-2007, 09:07 AM
Vicegrip's Avatar
Vicegrip Vicegrip is offline
Porkchop & SGB for prez!
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: The other Woodstock.
Posts: 13,277
Vicegrip has seven HoF threadsVicegrip has seven HoF threadsVicegrip has seven HoF threadsVicegrip has seven HoF threadsVicegrip has seven HoF threadsVicegrip has seven HoF threads
Default

Damn John, don't give out the secrets so easy. I need the HP boys to wimp the two fast corners so I can take the 180 turn away at the other end.
__________________
http://vimeo.com/29896988

“Those that can make you believe in absurdities can make you commit atrocities.” Voltaire.

"There is grandeur in this view of life...." Darwin.

The mountains are calling and I must go.

“The earth has music for those who listen”
Shakespeare.

You Matter.
(Until you multiply yourself times the speed of light squared. Then you Energy)

“We’ve got lots of theories, we just don’t have the evidence’.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump