[Potomac-Greg]

I am going to change my screenname to "Toothead Rod."

I prefer to pronounce it "Toot-head" not "Tooth-ead".

[Feliks]

Originally Posted by Potomac-Greg

I am going to change my screenname to "Toothead Rod."

I prefer to pronounce it "Toot-head" not "Tooth-ead".

Ok ,thanks Greg

Regards Andrew

[Feliks]

So far I didn't still deal with a brake system of the car .

Without any interference in a brake system existing so far, I will prolong his work live at least twice .
So so:
Do you know electric retarder in big truck and buses?
When they applied the ones electric retarder in these cars, consuming the part of a brake system it diminished repeatedly .
Rght now are possible using this retarder in little passengers cars
That is, when this my new idea ,will be applied dynastarter, one should also equip him with the function electric retarder. Namely, with the help of a brake pedal, at first to give the electricity on the one dynastarter with a view to braking for them, and only then, when braking will be this way insufficient, a brake pedal will start a traditional brake system .

This dismisser which will be possible for the accomplishment on dynastarter, will be acting on a bit of an other principle than electric retarderin lorries. That is, provided electricity to dynastarter, will be producing the braking torque similar to the holding torque in stepping motors.

I think, around when drivers will have the big red diode in the car ,led which will be becoming when traditional brakes are starting acting, they will be supposed this way to suppress ambitions so that she doesn't become , that is a traditional brake system is out of work. I think that an entire brake system used this way will be enough on all life of the car, without any exchanges of him parts friction.

This asolutely new function of new dynastarter.

Regards Andrew

[Feliks]

Principe oscillating disc dynamo (pendulum)


Red Pin :


























Regards Andrew

[Feliks]

Or swimmer too....



Andrew

[Lupin..the..3rd]

The swimmer is no good. It would get all rusty in the sea. And encrustulated with barnacles.

[Feliks]

Originally Posted by Lupin..the..3rd

The swimmer is no good. It would get all rusty in the sea. And encrustulated with barnacles.

Maybe this better (oscillating dynamo in sealed box):




Now I will describe the entire technology of modification swimmer.

Made a cheap swimmer :

1.To buy old sea containers.

2. Weld some diagonals new part too to improve the stiffness,

3. To paint the container this way modified with method of the bath in rustproof paint.

4 . Put for means container maximum polystyrene foam packed into strong plastic sacks.

5. To close the container tightly.

5. Through the small hole to fill up under the pressure with the foam polystyrene foam.
(automatically expanded one's volume)

6. We have a long time live swimmer weight about 3000 kG , and volume 33 m^3
Sum we have 30 000 KG (30 Ton) displacement force each .

Redy too using In oscillatory dynamo or water pumps make energy.



Regards Andrew

[Feliks]

That if to fill all unused spaces up on ships or planes with this polystyrene foam, most probably they stood unsinkable .

Thanks to the fact that it wouldn't be possible to sink them,
a lot of people so that it is possible to rescue.
And next
then to the shipyard it would be possible to tow away .



Recently I noticed ,that the aircraft would be very useful by the ability to swimming
Two days ago :

BBC

tu142


If such a shortcut poliuretane foam for construction of such parameters:




Specifications specific gravity after hardening 11 - 16 ,3 kg/m3* Base polyurethane Productivity of 825 ml – 66 litres * c 100 mb of the stream about the diameter of 5 2 cm * Pyłosuchość 8 - 10 minutes * Time of processing 15 - 30 minutes * Time of hardening from 5 up to 48 h (full mechanical load capacity) * a free access of air is Necessary. One should not apply foam in rooms closed tightly. Resistance to UV rays weak in outside applications one should shelter the surface of foam from the UV radiation. Structure of cells of c 70 % smoothed, evenly closed cells thermal Resistance after hardening from – 40 ° C to + 90 ° C (short-term to + 140 ° C)


15 bottle give 1 m^3 (1000 litres) cost about 80 $ , this can swimm 1 tones

Tupolew 142 have 80 ton weight 80 x 15 = , need 1200 pieces bottles this foam .


All cost of foam 80 x 80 $= 6400 $.
Whole weight of the foam to allow the total buoyancy such an airplane is 1200 KG
It is only 1% of the total weight of the aircraft.

Wig area is 311 m^2 , 80 m^3/ 312 m^2 = 0,25 m the average amount of surface foam on the inside wings. I think that in this plane is so much unused space.

And such buoyancy of the aircraft would also be found useful for Airbus over the Atlantic, as well as the Boening over Hudson.

Regards Andrew

[Feliks]

I see a few places where you can be put the foam.....





1% of the weight is almost the same as error weighting.


Regards Andrew

[Vicegrip]

Corrosion will be a bitch in all the filled compartments in the steel or aluminum built boats and fire in the airplanes.
the foam burns and produces toxic fumes. Many fiberglass boats are foam filled and there are boating codes with the requirement.

1% of a com airplanes weight can be make or break economically. They count the coats of paint.