997.1 06-08 IMS Bearing...should I Run? - Page 2 - Dorkiphus.net
Navigation » Dorkiphus.net > Technical & Track Disussions > Track Talk » 997.1 06-08 IMS Bearing...should I Run?

Track Talk A place to talk about Track and DE Events, share driving tips and other Track related items.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 12-28-2015, 10:56 AM
blipshift's Avatar
blipshift blipshift is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Gainesville
Posts: 1,186
blipshift
Default

I had an '05 C2 997.1. I bought it in 2011 with 10K miles and sold it earlier this month with 32K miles. It was used for city, highway, and track driving. As I recall, by VIN, it was a third round IMS car, meaning it was less susceptible for failure but wasn't a candidate for LN swap. I bought an extended 5yr 60K mile warranty through a dealership for about $2.5k which among other things specifically covered IMS failure. I used the warranty for several issues but never anything related with the IMS.

Upon a quick google search, as you know, you will be inundated with information about the IMS on the internet. Go a step further and talk to the folks who work on the cars day in and day out. Most, but not all, of the techs I've spoken with, both factory and indie, say miles and usage doesn't matter. They say there may be correlation to grease used near the IMS which may impact seals. Why it happens it truly still up for some debate.

Options are roll the dice, maintain and monitor, repair and replace with LN, or steer clear of the issue all together. I went with the maintain and monitor option and backed it up with the warranty. If I had to do it all over again I think I would have sprung for a non IMS impacted car and still bought the warranty.

Something else to consider when buying an originally $80k but now ten year old used car; they break, and when they do, you're going to feel it in the wallet. Make sure to account for preventative and repair maintenance costs which may impact your decision tree.
__________________
Harry

Good Ole days

Last edited by blipshift; 12-28-2015 at 11:36 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 12-28-2015, 11:13 AM
N Fotouhi's Avatar
N Fotouhi N Fotouhi is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: NJ
Posts: 2,415
N Fotouhi
Default

Skip, I have been reading the responses to your posts on RL and here. I have no experience with the later (996/997/991) variety, except being in the right seat at the track. Based on that alone, they all feel a lot nicer for a DD than 964.

One question I have is why not looking at 996/997tt? They do not seem to have the same issues as non-turbos and the AWD is a plus for road use. At least that is what I have always thought might satisfy my need for DD a p-car.
__________________
Nader

There are 3 sides to every story. Mine, yours, and the truth.

91 944 S2 - Mine, Sold
7? 914-6 Vintage racer - Mine
93 964 - Not mine
95 993 - Hers - Sold and will be missed
04 GT3 - ours? Doing double duties at DE, anyway
06 987 - Hers - plan to let son use for DE - My DIY
A few others

Last edited by N Fotouhi; 12-28-2015 at 11:13 AM. Reason: correction
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 12-28-2015, 12:00 PM
Hunter's Avatar
Hunter Hunter is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Great Falls, VA
Posts: 1,940
Hunter
Default

The TT have different motors.
__________________
Ken

2023 Audi Q7 Daily Driver
Considering next Porsche
1990 964, Red, Number 692 (Misty) sold
2010 Trailex (Dusty) sold
2003 996, (Speedy) Grey sold


Life is short; just drive....... (boat, bike, etc.)
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump