[N Fotouhi]

The 2014 proposed rules are on http://www.pca.org/Activities/ClubRa...singForms.aspx

The comment period ends October 1. 964 guys should have a lot to say.

[TurboPooch]

Originally Posted by N Fotouhi

The 2014 proposed rules are on http://www.pca.org/Activities/ClubRa...singForms.aspx

The comment period ends October 1. 964 guys should have a lot to say.

So will Good Hands...

[good hands]

PDK's have changed the playing field.

[N Fotouhi]

^
Time to man up.

[forklift]

I emailed mine in earlier this week. 100% against the 200# rule for RSAs and also commented in favor of alt street abs in 997s .

[antonioconceicao]

Originally Posted by forklift

I emailed mine in earlier this week. 100% against the 200# rule for RSAs and also commented in favor of alt street abs in 997s .

Why you against the 200 # ?

[forklift]

Originally Posted by antonioconceicao

Why you against the 200 # ?

Well I don't wan to add 200#s to my car for any reason to start with. I also don't want to be moved to F class with that 200# and race the Boxster S's which are almost as fast as our cars are now (w/o the extra 200#s).

If H prep RSA drivers aren't happy with their cars in H they can do what I did and de-mod and go back to G. Or if PCA determines it is warranted maybe they can give H RSAs a 100# weight reduction or something like that. I still don't think that would be enough of a benefit against the newer cars but would help some.

If this does pass (which I don't think it will), I don't know what I would do. I and many other G drivers have spent a lot of time, money and effort getting to 2,910.

[N Fotouhi]

Originally Posted by forklift

I and many other G drivers have spent a lot of time, money and effort getting to 2,910 in our cheater RSAs.

Fixed.

I do not think it will pass either, based on the email I received from the technical chair that had no mention of this, but lots of points/questions about the seat back brace. I recommended rejection of the proposal in my comments (wait, WTH was wrong with me ).

I also commented about the ABS, but my reading is that it is a more complicated technical issue based on potential benefits if they do not get it right, but PCA agrees that something needs to be done.

[antonioconceicao]

X100

Why not just use the euro RS weight on the H prep RSA ? That would be a simple solution to the 964's and a lot of options to all 964's

Originally Posted by forklift

Well I don't wan to add 200#s to my car for any reason to start with. I also don't want to be moved to F class with that 200# and race the Boxster S's which are almost as fast as our cars are now (w/o the extra 200#s).

If H prep RSA drivers aren't happy with their cars in H they can do what I did and de-mod and go back to G. Or if PCA determines it is warranted maybe they can give H RSAs a 100# weight reduction or something like that. I still don't think that would be enough of a benefit against the newer cars but would help some.

If this does pass (which I don't think it will), I don't know what I would do. I and many other G drivers have spent a lot of time, money and effort getting to 2,910.

[N Fotouhi]

Originally Posted by pjalexandre

Nader, re read my opening statement.

IMO, 100# is a fair starting point that will not put the PDK cars at a disadvantage. We can agree to disagree on this. If I am proved wrong on track, then we reduce the weight.

Originally Posted by antonioconceicao

X100

Why not just use the euro RS weight on the H prep RSA ? That would be a simple solution to the 964's and a lot of options to all 964's

Why stop at Euro RS weight when you can go with 964 Cup weight.