| Miscellaneous Discussions Off Topic (OT) items that really don't fit into any other Category |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Alright photography experts ... my wife wants a good digital SLR to pick up an expensive hobby she let go over these last several years [decades...?
She likes all the $$$ crap and we were both pretty knowlegeable w/r/t 35mm SLR cameras ... back in the day. She works for an architectural firm and can expand the "scope" of her employment by shooting buildings / projects / interiors as the opportunities arise. [see where this is going ...$$$ ... more track goodies pour moi Not going to be doing a lot [any] of speed / sport shooting as she doesn't go to the track, etc... [maybe kids sports in a few years]. I'm thinking of the package(s) below with body and basic lense and spring for tele-p / macro later ... if necessary. Articles, magazines I've read seem to suggest Canon bodies as have most lenses [reasonably priced] to select from. Also noted, if coming to digital SLR world without a boatload of lenses for a specific make ... already ... Canon suggested as a good "re-educator". Nikon is nice but $$$. Here is what I am thinking so far: 1. Canon Digital Rebel XTi 10.1MP Digital SLR Camera with EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 Lens (Black) $787.00 2. Olympus Evolt E500 8MP Digital SLR with 14-45mm f/3.5-5.6 & 40-150mm f/3.5-4.5 Zuiko Lenses $650 3.Nikon D70S 6.1MP Digital SLR Camera Kit with 18-70mm Nikkor Lens Body only $615 ... with lense $850. Let me know your thoughts within the parameters mentioned above for something in the price range mentioned. I'd like to hear about ease of operation, interchangeability, product quality, image quality, features I haven't thought of? I doubt she will spend the huge amounts of time necessary to learn new software and manipulate the large digi photos. Photoshop is where it is at [we have] for now besides the software bundled with the purchase. Thanks for the help *have been to and read about the www.four-thirds.org concept ![]() |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Wayne might be able to help a little
__________________
Thank Me Dammit! |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
I have the D70s and love it, despite the fact that it doesn't have "live preview" - you know, the LCD doesn't show exactly what's in the lens. Paid $600 for it w/ lens back in Oct. You should be able to find something similar if you want to go Nikon - $850 for that camera sounds a bit steep.
I don't know much about photography, so hopefully someone who knows their shiat like Photoeditor will chime in. I like the camera, though, and am glad I got it. Have not missed the extra 4MP the D80 had.
__________________
Chris M 1985 911 Carrera with a couple cosmetic only mods 2006 E90 330i 1999 E46 328i |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
I'm far from an expert in digital SLRs and love my ol' OM1md but from the little research I've done so far, Cannon comes out on top.
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
D70 for the simple reason that Nikon has the best glass bar none.
If you can try finding the original D70 as it came with a better kit lense. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
"Beretta"
Quote:
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
If you're starting from scratch (no leftover lenses from film body you might use), I think any you mention are excellent. Canon/Nikon/Olympus are all excellent lens manufacturers, which is the most important aspect of good photography. I have been a Canon user for more than 30 years, so am prejudiced somewhat. As far as lenses and accessories, I believe Canon and Nikon will provide more variety.
__________________
- Tony P. Currently - 1984 944 SP2 racer - 1977 911 KM Special vintage racer - 2000 Boxster S (now mine) - 1995 993 (garage queen) - 2007 Cayman S (wife's track beast) - 2017 F350 (tow monster) - 2018 Jeep Wrangler - 1982 911 Targa (resurrection in process) Gone but not forgotten - 1989 944S2 - 1979 RX7 - 1986 944 - 1991 944S2 (in car heaven...) - 2001 Chevy Suburban 2500 (FIL's beast now) - 2012 Cayman R |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
I have the digital Rebel and like it very much. It was an easy choice for me because I have a Canon A2E and all of my lenses would work. I agree that you should probably spend less on the body and more on the lenses. A basic body now has 8 or 10megs so the more advanced features may not be worth spending the money (jmo). Hold them, they do have different feels to them. I do not know if I would agree that the Nikon lenses are better, especialy in the professional line, not that I have any; however, Nikon and Canon are both good picks.
__________________
Jim A. 2010 E93 M3 Sadly Departed P-Cars 1990 944 S2 Cab, 2002 996, 2000 Boxster, 1987 944 |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
one more vote for the D70. i have one of the "Original ones" Shoots like a film cam. How much is the D80 with glass going for? (EDIT $930 on line for a US unit from a auth. seller.) Go for that one. We can price creep cool hobby stuff so can she.
__________________
http://vimeo.com/29896988 “Those that can make you believe in absurdities can make you commit atrocities.” Voltaire. "There is grandeur in this view of life...." Darwin. The mountains are calling and I must go. “The earth has music for those who listen” Shakespeare. You Matter. (Until you multiply yourself times the speed of light squared. Then you Energy) “We’ve got lots of theories, we just don’t have the evidence’. Last edited by Vicegrip; 02-06-2007 at 03:11 PM. |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
First version was plain ol' D70. The 'S' came after (IIRC) and offered a slightly bigger display screen and some minor programming changes. The lense, however, was a lesser quality. Not bad, just lesser.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|