![]() |
I used to hear the '73-74 cars as having bumper "tits" vs the clean smooth early cars and the huge rubber bumper 75-76 cars. 73's had them in front only iirc. '74 had them front and rear. '75-76 cars, in MD and CA were even required to have nipples on their huge bumpers for an especially heavy look.
IMHO, look for the least rusty and go from there. Later (72+) had centric front wheel hub and by 73 the tailshifter trans which does make a difference in stirring the stick in the butter churn transmission. An early 1.7 feels nearly as quick as a late 2.0 imho. My '76 was rated at 86hp. My 70 1.7 was rated at 80hp, but it was about 200lbs lighter. Of course, 73-74 2.0 are the most sought after. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
1) heavier bumpers front and rear, culminating in the huge impact bumpers 2) heavier door beams 3) thicker body panels 4) sound deadening 5) options Like any Porsche, there were continual yearly developments and changes that almost always made them heavier. |
Quote:
Still trying to decide if I want to go look at it or if it's too much of a project right now. |
just to show advertised east coast car, no affiliation, just looking to help spend someone elses money. Don't buy a rusty, and they ALL have rust, car.
http://www.914world.com/bbs2/index.php?showtopic=238640 one in TN: http://www.914world.com/bbs2/index.php?showtopic=247084 |
1 Attachment(s)
|
|
Quote:
|
Sorry. When I saw this on 914world it was $19k
http://www.914world.com/bbs2/index.php?showtopic=249520 |
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:08 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.