Quote:
Originally Posted by APKhaos
A large number of Dorki were at the meeting, including the guy who started this thread. Not one of them said a word, with the single exception of Dave D.
|
I was there, but didn't speak up. Why? Well, I don't really care that much one way or the other to be honest. Not enough to stand up and make a stink about it. Its the same amount of track time either way, and I think our goal is not so much quantity of heat cycles, but maximaztion of track time.
Plus, and lets be honest, the environment there wasn't exectly conducive to an open discussion. We were told early on that the instructors want 3 sessions a day. Most of the rest of the meeting was basically the instructors that wanted 3 a day sessions standing in the inner circle of the meeting agreeing with each other. Tom did a very good job of being impartial and trying to get differeing view points, but it was clear that a lot of the PCA brass around him were in favor of the 3 a day model. WHen any talk of 4 sessions came up, there was a lot of head shaking, frowning, and interrupting.
I wonder this - is Kurt the ONLY instructor that has gone on record as preferring 4 sessions a day? Because to talk to the people at the track, this whole idea is a student (and more specifically a Dorkiphus) led idea. The common consensus is that the students want 4, instructors want 3. Since the instructors are the ones out there volunteering their time to teach the feeling is (and this was stated explicitly at the meeting) that if they want 3, then it should be 3.
I asked my instructor on Sunday about it, and her feeling was that 3 sessions a day is better because if her car breaks, she has more time to get it working again. Honestly, its a good point and I can't argue with that.
So to me, instructors are more apt to want 3 sessions because they are less likely to lose track time because of idiot maneuvers and getting a session black flagged. They are more likely to lose track time due to mechanicals, and want that buffer zone in there to fix stuff. So I understand why some would want 3. But what about all the talk from the instructors I know about student attention span, etc, and things being better in 4 shorter sessions? I didn't hear that mentioned at the meeting. And not being an instructor, I'm sure as hell not going to suggest it.
Dave (}{) above though points out something that did annoy me, though. If we've paid for the track until 5:00, why is it cold at 4:20? There was 40mins of wasted time that we could have use to make up for the black flagged session in white.
Like I said before, our goal is maximization of track time. Going to 4 sessions helps minimize the issue of a black flagged session. The waiting around thing, while somewhat sucks, I think is a much lesser issue. So is there a way to solve the lost session issue and stick with 3 sessions a day? How about this: On the last day of the event, combine the last black/red session (this seems to happen almost all the time anyway). Then, when green comes off, have open white/black/red session for anyone who's left until the end of the day. I'm sure the white students will be more than happy to give passing signals to the red/black guys in the same way they vote in Chicago - early and often.